"...I want to be an overrated celebrity reading a copy of A Seperate Peace in one a them READ posters you see in school liberries when I grow up. I also like run-on sentences..." --Lydia Fultz 
Lydia Fultz, known to Anonymous as "Marlysfan" is a rabid anti-Scientologist who has made it her business to dig up whatever information she can find on the parishioners of her local Church of Scientology Org, and make it available for the predators and stalkers within Anonymous to use for their own nefarious ends.
Lydia Fultz is a cyber-stalker, a liar, and a hypocrite. I will be contacting the individuals whom she has placed in harms way, and ensure that they know who put them there. It is my sincerest hope that they take appropriate action against this intolerant, libelous bigot.
In her own words, she claims to be "...quite far from a terrorist-I believe that all critic activities should be safe, peaceful, and legal. What I did was not stalking or terrorism-I was simply posting public information I obtained on the internet..." Which is like saying, "I'm against racism. I just think that people ought to know why blacks should be hated."
Lydia Fultz is a cyber-stalker and a bigot, there is no question about it. And while she claims to not be "Anonymous" she is working hand in glove with the hate group in her efforts to persecute individual Scientologists. For example, other names have just been added to the list which she started:
"AnonymousWe Are Legion
Re: Info on Members of the Kansas City Org
Two other names for KC. No further info.Michelle Duquette
Jacqueline Lynnette (Jackie) Dodds"
According to Lydia and her Anonymous cohorts, none of this qualifies as cyber-stalking. Just to see if they can live up to their own standards, let's see what they think about this:
Formerly wrote for the Spectrum, of Penn Valley Community College, 3201 Southwest Trafficway, Kansas City, MO. 64111 Telephone: (816) 759-4280
Lydia Fultz (816) 531-2150 301 W Armour Blvd,Kansas City, MO 64111
marlysfan@yahoo.com
Lydia may not be an official flag waving, pedophile-adoring, mask wearing member of Anonymous, but I believe she can still be safely lumped in with the rest of them; while she lacks the overt cowardice which typifies the average Anonymous cyber-terrorist, she does display the requisite contempt for the rights of others.
Tom Newton
Related:
43 comments:
This blog is a fail LOL
Firstly, if you think this is cyberstalking why are you doing it? Secondly:
"I will be contacting the individuals whom she has placed in harms way, and ensure that they know who put them there."
That's harassment Tom, which makes you a cyberstalker.
"Firstly, if you think this is cyberstalking why are you doing it?"
Is it? Or isn't it?
Tom
^What matters is how you define it. Live to your own standards. Technically merely posting details isn't stalking. However the abusive and abrasive language you used could still be classed as harassment. This might make what you're doing stalking. Lets' have the link to where she posted the details. I'm fairly certain you won't see any of these things.
Also, you have, in the past, said that you will cease your activities when your demands are met. That is called terrorism and that, in conjuntion with abusive way in which you presented your information does make you a cyberstalking terrorist. Funny how you've always been trying desperately to paint Anonymous as this huge monster and you ended up becoming it.
While we're on the topic, you claim to be an 'impartial blogger'. You seem to have misunderstood the meaning of impartial. An impartial person adds nothing to a debate. Calling people names, speculating without due cause and making accusations means you are not definitely not impartial.
"hat is called terrorism and that, in conjuntion with abusive way in which you presented your information does make you a cyberstalking terrorist."
Is it more abusive than, let's say, sending an obese man running into a Church, covered in Vaseline and pubic hair?
Tom
^Apples and Oranges, that's a poorly thought out prank that went too far, that doesn't constitute terrorism. There was no campaign of the same guy doing that repeatedly until his demands were met.
Hey, it's marlysfan...nice investigative work. By the way, thanks for adding a link to my EditRed page. Promotion is always appreciated.
"Is it more abusive than, let's say, sending an obese man running into a Church, covered in Vaseline and pubic hair? "
Yes. Agent Pubit was nice and didn't hurt anyone. But you are hurting Lydia's feelings by what you write.
Feed her to the chans!
Lydia Fultz (816) 531-2150 301 W Armour Blvd,Kansas City, MO 64111
marlysfan@yahoo.com
Formerly wrote for the Spectrum, of Penn Valley Community College, 3201 Southwest Trafficway, Kansas City, MO. 64111 Telephone: (816) 759-4280
Feed her to the chans!
Lydia Fultz (816) 531-2150 301 W Armour Blvd,Kansas City, MO 64111
marlysfan@yahoo.com
Formerly wrote for the Spectrum, of Penn Valley Community College, 3201 Southwest Trafficway, Kansas City, MO. 64111 Telephone: (816) 759-4280
fail blog is fail
feed her to the chans? Only cuz of that horrible hair in that pic. Srsly, Marly that is soooo not your color.
Hey, I LIKE my horrible wig!
"Lydia Fultz is a cyber-stalker, a liar, and a hypocrite. I will be contacting the individuals whom she has placed in harms way, and ensure that they know who put them there. It is my sincerest hope that they take appropriate action against this intolerant, libelous bigot."
I'm on the phone now, Marlysfan.
Perhaps you should consider hiring an attorney.
Tom
Looks like Tom gave you your own blog:
http://marlysfan.blogspot.com/
"I'm on the phone now, Marlysfan.
Perhaps you should consider hiring an attorney. "
This kind of harassment is called stalking Tom. You should be careful, remember what happened to your last blog.
Fuck you, I'll harass and abuse who I want when I want, I have a right to do that. Anonymous has dared to speak ill of the Church of Scientology, there is no limit to what I can do to them. You will all pay.
Tom
you truly are scam, how did you get the info of these people? and how long have you had it?
The source doesnt matter, what matters is that these cyber terrorists are getting what they deserve. They have been so incredibly suppressive that they deserve total destruction but this is the best I can do without revealing myself and being a target for their terrorist acts.
Tom
marlysfan again-
Tom, are you sure you're a Scientologist? Most of the Scientologists I've met are pretty even-tempered. You, however, sound like you're about to have an aneurysm. For the love of Christ, calm down!
Obviously, I have an impersonator.
I'm not a Scientologist. I'm a Christian.
Tom
^So your lies are cyclical? You started off claiming to not be a Scientologist, then you claimed to be a Christian, then a Satanist, then a worshipper of Ancient Egyptian sun gods, then an Atheist Christian.
2 questions Tom,
1) how does lowering yourself to anonymous' level (to use your words) make you a more moral person than them? It seems like both you and anonymous are pigs in shit fighting over rotten scraps
2) doesn't this validate anonymous fair game claims? I can't see it any other way
I came here expecting to find evidence for horrible things anonymous have done (I received a flyer from a scientologist last week). However everything i've seen on this site is vile; it reflects very poorly on scientology - i mean i can't believe that a church that claims to have "some of the most ethical people on the planet" can support something like this.
And before you deny any church involvement - the flyer the church gave me had this website on it.
Tim
Hello Tim.
Addressing your questions:"1) how does lowering yourself to anonymous' level (to use your words) make you a more moral person than them? "
I am merely exposing their hypocrisy. Lydia Fultz is a confirmed cyber-stalker and anti-religion extremist. Now that she's had a taste of her own medicine, she'll consider the consequences next time she tries to feed innocent Scientologists to the Anonymous hate group."2) doesn't this validate anonymous fair game claims? I can't see it any other way"
No. She did it first. If anything, it demonstrates that "Fair Game" is a lie, as I have successfully proven."I came here expecting to find evidence for horrible things anonymous have done (I received a flyer from a scientologist last week)."
Are you illiterate, Tim? Hatch Mckay? Agent Pubit? Oliver Shaper? Are you stupid as well?"However everything i've seen on this site is vile; it reflects very poorly on scientology - i mean i can't believe that a church that claims to have "some of the most ethical people on the planet" can support something like this."
Vile? Is PEDOBEAR vile to you, Tim, or are you also a child-raper?"And before you deny any church involvement - the flyer the church gave me had this website on it."
Sure. I provide my fliers to lots of people as a public service. So what? Scientologists expect that people are smart enough to make up their own minds. Unlike Anonymous, who want to impose their stupidly on whoever they can. They insist that Scientologists stop believing as they do.
Tim, please choke yourself.
Tom Newton
^As always, Tom Newton, Scientologist shill being aggressive and abusive.
Tom, you dummy. You put this gal's info up because you want to scare her into silence. Fuck you, you're a total cunt.
^
In Tom's defense, she did post dox on the KC Org first...
^Nice try Tom.
^To continue, I'm sure that soon you'll make the profile hidden. However, people will still be able to see that that account is the author of:
http://faces-of-anonymous.blogspot.com/
in the page source at that blog.
"And before you deny any church involvement - the flyer the church gave me had this website on it. "
lol, really? LOOOOL
Lol, busted again Tom. Your ability to embarrass yourself knows no bounds.
hello, you don't know me but i am the artist that photoshoped the picture of lydia fultz (the third one you posted.) that picture is a copy writed piece of artwork. you have reproduced it here without permission or monetary compensation to the artist. you have two choices here. you can pay me the $2000 value i have now placed on the piece of art (and the right to use said material freely) or you can remove it. also the address you listed as belonging to lydia fultz is MINE. not hers. i subleased her apartment MONTHS AGO. if you do not remove my address from this page immediately i will be forced to 1) take it up with blogger, and 2) see what legal recourse i have in this matter as well. you are a narrow minded hypocrite who preaches against "cyber terrorists" and yet you have constructed here a steaming pile of tripe that can have construed as nothing less. you are not only ignorant, and determined to spew ignorance when having your beliefs questioned, but you also do so poorly and with out checking your facts. you are both an affront to good sense and decency and a complete ass. keep writing this crap. you are doing anonymous's job for them, and giving them a perfect example of why the pseudo religion of scientology will never be accepted under american law as a real religion.
so "Tom" posted the WRONG docs on marlysfan AND wrong docs on machwon.
So you are slandering innocents and posting libelous information about people who are NOT in this anon shit and at LEAST one person who probably never heard of scientology or protests or anything. (including his VIN? wtf, that CAN'T be legal.)
not to mention I see you have made a fake account called "Captain Adderall" today which is not the same blogger profile as the other CAPTAIN ADDERALL i saw post on this site and which contains links to this site.
How much deception is really necessary for whatever point you think you're proving. Anyone can google any of the information on these pages and EASILY confirm how wrong all this info is.
Tom is just proving he is above even his own logic. The law can hold him back he will find you and destroy you even if uninvolved people go down.
Scientology's writings suggest a planed genocide of 12 billion people.I get this because Scientologist are taught that 20% of the human race is determined to destroy all good things (like Scientology) and can't be converted. So I did the math and it comes up to 12 billion people are this kind of person.
P.S. just using a Tom like argument to demonize Scientology to make a point how easy it is to use a half truths to come up with this idea the Scientology wants to kill 12 billion people.
lol added an extra zero
Scientology wants to kill every one twice lol.
> Sure. I provide my fliers to lots of people as a public service. So what? Scientologists expect that people are smart enough to make up their own minds.
Let me ask you this Tom. I want to you to stop and think about it for a few minutes.
Let's say you have two groups. Group A and Group B (as to not be offensive). Each says that their method is the only and perfect path to reach a state of "awesomeness".
With both groups claiming they're absolutely correct, how do you determine who actually is.
Well, if you think about it I think you'd reach the same conclusion as I have, that is to say that you learn about both and subjectively analyze the information given to you by both groups.
I have gone through and read ALL the basics books. I purchased them from eBay and read each and every one of them. I even made sure I had no misunderstood words and cleared each one as I read.
I then go and read what Anonymous has to say via their message boards.
You know what I found Tom?
I found that Scientology's statements and positions are akin to an "argument of authority", that is to say "Hubbard said it, so it's true." Whereas Anonymous' position is one of evidence (sometimes biased) and you make your own decision.
When I compare these two, logic forces me to side with Anonymous. Not because their attitudes are correct or because they're right, but because they allow the individual to find out for themselves and reach a different conclusion then what is put forwards. This is an atmosphere which is not allowed in the Scientiology literature I have read.
The real question here is if Scientology works all the time and is actually correct in it's claims, why is the following being done:
1) Scientific Studies validating claims not being performed.
2) L Ron's Research published for the scientific community's scrutiny.
3) Why are people labeled as "suppressive" after they have gone clear? Isn't this admitting that Scientology doesn't work? Otherwise, how did a SP manage to progress that far in an ORG?
4) Same as 3, except how are people determined to be suppressive when they are at higher levels that require courses at an advanced org. How are they not able to see it.
5) Why isn't Scientology's complexes completely open to the public?
and finally...
6) Why is it that L Ron's life is misrepresented in his biography? Why is this required? Shouldn't his work stand on it's own merits?
Please be advised: Members of the hate group Anonymous are known to frequent this blog. Do not leave any personally identifying information in your post.
This is a fascinating site.
"
I found that Scientology's statements and positions are akin to an "argument of authority", that is to say "Hubbard said it, so it's true." Whereas Anonymous' position is one of evidence (sometimes biased) and you make your own decision.
When I compare these two, logic forces me to side with Anonymous. Not because their attitudes are correct or because they're right, but because they allow the individual to find out for themselves and reach a different conclusion then what is put forwards. This is an atmosphere which is not allowed in the Scientiology literature I have read."
Your logic is flawed. Anonymous and other anti-Scientology activists don't want people to see both sides. What they want is for people to see their side and their version of the other side.
You base your argument on the idea that both sides have been given equal consideration.
Tom Newton
Anonymous and other anti-Scientology activists don't want people to see both sides.That's simply not true. Anonymous and critics have NO power EXCEPT freeing the information that Scientology has locked up or distorted.
They have no motive to lie, whereas Scientology asks for your money at every step, from the first book you buy, until you are tapped out of your savings and forced into servitude in SeaOrg in order to be allowed to get auditing.
General rule of thumb in life, kids: the guy scheming on your money is not to be trusted.
TL;DR version first:
Tom Newton's real name is Bruce N Burhans and if you whitepage/google his name on ZabaSearch/WhitePages or an Intelius BackGround check you'll dig up his address/phone number. None of which are here even though I doubt the mods would be upset by it :)
The question is quite rhetorical in nature these days, ultimately when asking the question "Who is Tom Newton" one uncovers a ridiculous web of fake user-names, multiple personalities and an identity and personality disorder that would scare Barbara Schwarz. However, since some of us have been posting to various linux user groups for many years, SOME of us who migrated from one thing to the next (ultimately ending up here) know who Tom Newton really is.
It kind of starts in 2000 or a little earlier on the Debian usenet. He posts as a user named "Bruce Burhans" but in his introductory posting states he is from Bellingham Washington State. Fast forward to 2005 and he is using the name Tom Newton. How did the Internet forget about this guy and how did we come to believe his name is REALLY Alan Connor? The fact is simple, when trolling users Bruce typically lets a piece of his real life go into his postings until he has obtained the coveted "NO U" answer to which he begins his trolling.
A briefing history of Tom which reveals his identity...
Bruce Burhans = Farley Benn?
Pay attention to what is being said in that discussion, notice the "Bruce from Bellingham" statement? That's kind of key. Now this post is important. This is his real first introductory attempt at trolling a usenet and he's left himself open. Unfortunately the concept of "doxing/trolling"a person online had not yet come of age. Therefore, the following snippet on a Washington State "Green Peace" clone website goes un-noticed.
"Bruce Burhans of Seattle writes about our recent program on losses of the ozone layer. "you have aired two excellent programs on the ozone problem, " Mr. Burhans writes, "but have not mentioned the semi-conductor PC chip industry." Their solvents, he says, are a growing source of ozone-destroying chemicals."
Sauce: Living on Earth: August 21 1992
Now go to this link: Intelius Search: Bruce Burhans
Notice something? Seattle? Bellingham?
I'd expand on this, but I find this information is PROBABLY sufficient to now troll/annoy Bruce with.
Also, think about this one
FCC Amateur Radio License:
Call Sign: KB7OCI, Licensee ID: L00200535
Grant Date: 09/03/1991, Expiration Date: 09/03/2001, Cancelation Date: 09/04/2003
Registrant: Bruce N Burhans,************, Seattle, WA 98122
Anonymous is offline Report Post Reply With Quote
Who ever Tom really is, he remains a warped troll who probably spends his time drinking pee and whacking off at how profound he is.
In other words, according to several Dr.s I associate with and who've read this blog, he is a certifiable attention whore and the only reason this blog still stands is because it continues to make Scientology look like a basket of fruitloops and the scam it likely is.
Keep up the great work Mr. 'Newton'! The CoS needs more like you, and it saves the critics a tonne of work!
Carl R.
"Mr. C. Ridner said...
In other words, according to several Dr.s I associate with and who've read this blog, he is a certifiable attention whore and the only reason this blog still stands is because it continues to make Scientology look like a basket of fruitloops and the scam it likely is. "
Hello Carl,
Your attempted argumentum ad populum fails. And so do you for requiring outside "experts" to tell you what you should think.
Go catch the Swine Flu.
Tom
Post a Comment
ALL DEATH THREATS WILL BE REPORTED TO GOOGLE.COM, THE FBI, AND YOUR LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.