"Nikki Catsouras was an 18 year old whore who proved, yet again, that women can't drive." -- "Anonymous" Cyber-Bully/ Anti-Scientology Activist
Extremely graphic photos of Nikki Catsouras, 18, after she crashed a Porsche into a concrete toll booth in 2006, are available all over the Internet. Apparently, she borrowed the car from her parents without permission and, after losing control of the speeding vehicle, crashed and died upon impact.
This is where the cyber-bully network known as Anonymous gets involved. They are using those death scene photos to harass Nikki's family, and to desecrate her memory. It got so bad that Nikki's parents have withdrawn their other daughter from school because they fear students might confront her with the pictures.
According to one Anonymous planning website, Nikki's sister should not be protected from seeing the gruesome death scene photos:
"Anonymous has taken their actions as a challenge, and plans to erect a billboard bearing the images outside the girl's bedroom window." --- Source EncyclopediaDramatica.com
The EncyclopediaDramatica.com article referenced above also states that the images of the dead teenager are good for "fapping," which is Internet slang for masturbation. Additionally, the same necrophiliac sentiments are expressed on one image of Nikki in which her nearly severed head is exposed. The caption reads "I'd Still Hit It."
This nasty, anti-social behavior is typical of Anonymous. At one of their anti-Scientology hate rallies, they deliberately tried to "psychologically damage" a Scientologist by dressing up as his dead daughter, berating him for his religion, and claiming that Scientology caused his daughter to take her own life. Anonymous cyber-bullies seem to prefer younger victims, and always involve the target's families in the attacks, as in the case of 14 year old Hatch Mckay, who was the recipient of death threats, homosexual pornography, and various "pranks" involving call girls and random pizza deliveries.
In my opinion, it's about time these cowards give up their protests against Scientology. As a demonstrably anti-social hate group, their opinions about any religion should be regarded as questionable. Who really cares what a network of scum-bag cyber-bullies who "joke" about masturbating to images of dead teenagers think about anything?
This is the kind of thing which makes me want to identify as many of these Anonymous punks as I can. Someone has to hold them accountable for their crimes...
Tom Newton
41 comments:
Sick
"Someone has to hold them accountable for their crimes..."
AGREED!
Oh wait. I was wrong. I meant to say that Mark Bunker raped my 12 year old girl, only it wasn't rape because she was drugged up and I gave consent.
Lulz!
Rebecca Cohen
You know why no one takes AIAHGB serious (aside from the fact no one except anonymous reads it) is that anyone not in a mind control cult like Scientology who can think freely and for themselves can recognize the difference between ED and the rest of anonymous who protest the cult of Scientology's crimes peacefully and legally. ED is not anonymous and anonymous is not ED. Do the 2 straddle a common goal when it comes to the topic of stopping the cult of Scientology... yes. But does everything ED do come directly from anonymous?... of course not. That is why Tom fails to actually get anything accomplished. After all Toms been wasting time on this web page for like a year or 2 almost and has it stopped or even slowed down anonymous? Absolutely not. In fact his out right lies and pointless post on slow news day in the world of anon vs scilon actually hurt Scientology because for the 9 people a month that are not in anonymous who visit the web site they see all the nasty shit you write about with no proof and what amounts to obviously someones opinion and no statistical evidence or proof to back up your claims hurts the cult of Scientology as a group because here are the "Internet hacker terrorist group Anonymous" and they have proof and dox to back up what they say and here is some Scientologist named Tom who is a pervert for bringing shit like that up and not having any proof to back it up or counter the hard evidence against his cult. You need more than your opinion to sway potential newcomers. A PICTURE OF ANONYMOUS OVER A NASTY POST ABOUT A DEAD GIRL MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE YOUR EXPLOITING THIS POOR GIRLS DEATH FOR THE AIMS OF BETTERING SCIENTOLOGY. Whatever... either way this is a waste of your time. Maybe you should change tactics when they are clearly not working. Maybe flyers or counter protesting or something like that would produce better results, or any results for that matter. After all when is Toms website ever actually accomplished something other than retelling a old story secondhand with a slightly different opinion?
"A PICTURE OF ANONYMOUS OVER A NASTY POST ABOUT A DEAD GIRL MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE YOUR EXPLOITING THIS POOR GIRLS DEATH FOR THE AIMS OF BETTERING SCIENTOLOGY."
Links have been provided, you illiterate ignoramus.
Tom
read the whole post fatty not just the part you can paraphrase to fit your argument. whens ur counter protest huh? never? i thought so. only anon comes here why waste time if your message is only reaching anonymous? why do you still maintain this site if it doesnt get results? and what kind of douche sits at his computer refreshing over and over to see if someone refutes (with facts) your bullshit. lest see how long it takes for toy to put down the cheeseburger and respond to this post?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_opera_in_Scientology_scripture
"You know why no one takes AIAHGB serious"
Not all my readers are mindless drones and followers. Your argumentum ad populum FAILS.
Tom
You are correct about one thing: I love cheese burgers.
moot won haha i just saw that. keep up the good work. your contributions to the anti anti-scientolgy racket sure have been succesful.
Up in the corner it says "public hair raid" I think you mean "pubic hair raid" don't you? You need to be clear and let the public know the true facts of such a disgusting stunt. Either way were rooting for you against those racist hate mongering hackers. Also I tried to donate some money, nothing big just enough to help with server cost and the pay-pal icon you offered said it didn't exist. How does one donate?
""Anonymous" Cyber-Bully/ Anti-Scientology Activist"
That's funny, I looked at the first 10 people to edit the article and its creator. None of them have edited articles on Scientology on ED.
"Up in the corner it says
......
offered said it didn't exist. How does one donate?"
Protip: Try using a different computer when you samefag, or are you claiming someone broke into your house to use yours?
I think this connection you believe exists between encyclopedia dramatica and the people protesting against the criminal acts of the cult of scientology has gone beyond willfull ignorance. The only really connection between the protesters and encyclopedia dramatica is that they are using the internet, meaning you are just as implicated in the satire you label as crimes as the protesters are.
Haha so flat out lying is fine as long as it furthers the cause of the Cult?
Adding a Donate Now Button
I've taken your advice and posted anonymously to protect myself from these bigots. I completely agree with your Tom, you keep showing these people that it just isn't right to speak ill of the Church of Scientology. Anyone who disagrees is beneath the protection of the law and all the things you do to them are justified simply because of the truth they are trying to suppress.
You are wrong on one point:
"Anyone who disagrees is beneath the protection of the law and all the things you do to them are justified simply because of the truth they are trying to suppress."
They are beneath protection of the law because they are evil to society in general, and not only to the Scientologists.
Tom
"They are beneath protection of the law because they are evil to society in general, and not only to the Scientologists."
The people who protest against Scientology are no more connected to the people posting this (somewhat off color) satire than you are, the only real connection is that they both use the internet (something you seem to do with equal if not greater frequency). If that is what makes the protesters guilty (or evil) it makes you equally guilty (or evil).
I see you are yet again imitating people who you wish to frame. FFS, at least set up a new gmail account to take donations. You are clumsy at best and it just isn't wise for someone as stupid as you to try and pull crap like this because you just end up with a chicken coop worth of egg on your face.
"Someone has to hold them accountable for their crimes."So far you have not presented evidence of one criminal act linked with the people who protest against the cult and the only commentary from police at the protests is in praise of how peaceful they are. Do you even understand what a crime is? I remember you claiming to have irrefutable proof of Donald Myers being charged with the crime of 'insulting a police officer'.
Just so you understand. Protesting against anything, including a cult that ruthlessly exploits humanity is not a crime. Making jokes you find offensive is not a crime. Saying things you disagree with is not a crime.
Hey Tom. A twitter sock of yours was found.
http://twitter.com/DeadNikki
For shame, Tom. Painting Anonymous as ones who harass people while you go around and exploit a dead person for your own personal gain.
Can only expect that from Scientology.
Know how it's a Tom Sock? It's all copy/pasted. Just like he copy/pastes everything else outside this website.
^
That's an Anonymous setting me up.
Tom
""So far you have not presented evidence of one criminal act linked with the people who protest against the cult and the only commentary from police at the protests is in praise of how peaceful they are. Do you even understand what a crime is? I remember you claiming to have irrefutable proof of Donald Myers being charged with the crime of 'insulting a police officer'."
Uhh, hello stupid.
Donald has already been issued restraining orders. You ignoramus.
Tom
"The people who protest against Scientology are no more connected to the people posting this (somewhat off color) satire than you are"
Did you even go to that page? It's ANONYMOUS MEMBERS doing it. Jesus Christ, Almighty. It's like arguing with a drunk.
There is nothing funny about it. It's not satire. It's cruel and exploitive.
You seriously think you can point your 9000 fingers at ME, and label me the criminal when all I am doing is pointing out ANONYMOUS' criminal conduct. By your logic, the Associated Press is a terrorist organization for covering the events of 9-11.
Tom
^
That's an Anonymous setting me up.
^ That's a lie, Tom. You've been known to do this with many socks before. What makes this any different? You're no better then the people you're fighting against.
Anonymous members are constantly trolling as Tom Newton and saying the most off the wall, ridiculous things. For example, someone posting as Tom Newton spammed the Alt.Religion Scientology with claims that "Tory Magoo Eats Babies" and "Worships Satan."
Most of the time, I don't bother refuting what the trolls say. It's better not to feed them.
Tom Newton
why add a donate button, i made that post up today at work about wanting to donate. you will never admit it cuz you realize the futility of maintaing a page that no one but anon views but i know for a fact that you will never see dollar one from anyone in the history of accepting donations on this page. i made that shit up you douche. do you actually believe someone would give you money to facilitate this bullshit web page. you don't even provide proof only opinion and conjecture on shit you weren't even present for or have nothing to do with. what a douche. douche douche douche
why add a donate button, i made that post up today at work about wanting to donate. you will never admit it cuz you realize the futility of maintaing a page that no one but anon views but i know for a fact that you will never see dollar one from anyone in the history of accepting donations on this page. i made that shit up you douche. do you actually believe someone would give you money to facilitate this bullshit web page. you don't even provide proof only opinion and conjecture on shit you weren't even present for or have nothing to do with. what a douche. douche douche douche
"Did you even go to that page? It's ANONYMOUS MEMBERS doing it. Jesus Christ, Almighty. It's like arguing with a drunk.
There is nothing funny about it. It's not satire. It's cruel and exploitive. "
And what evidence can you present for that? Everyone on encyclopedia dramatica has to have a username and anonymous posting is not allowed.
Just because you don't find something funny that doesn't mean it isn't funny (just for clarification, neither do I but I'm not bigoted enough to go and label it as being not funny). If anything you're the one being exploitive, they're just making a joke, you're drawing false conclusions to further your petty vendetta.
"Did you even go to that page? It's ANONYMOUS MEMBERS doing it. Jesus Christ, Almighty. It's like arguing with a drunk."
Seeings as you have a whole blog dedicated to the "anonymous" phenomena, I find it incredible that you still dont understand what anonymous is! There are no anonymous members, only people posting anonymously. Get it nao? Its not a group, and saying that they are is like saying all americans agree with Jeffrey Dahmer.
Apparently, you no longer need to pay for Scientology materials, you can find them and read them for free online, just as Hubbard intended when he said that the information (tech) should reach everybody and clear the planet ASAP. Now that its free for everybody, its only a matter of time before the Tech will prove its worth, right?
Hey Rebecca,
me and Garry want to have a nice little
party. How much would your daughter cost
for the weekend? We have enough heroin
to keep her happy all day and all of the
night. Does she do dogs too?
best regards
Michael
PS: This site is great, Tom where do you
get all this young meat? Can you get babies
too?
Anonymous members are constantly trolling as Tom Newton and saying the most off the wall, ridiculous things. For example, someone posting as Tom Newton spammed the Alt.Religion Scientology with claims that "Tory Magoo Eats Babies" and "Worships Satan."
Most of the time, I don't bother refuting what the trolls say. It's better not to feed them.
^
So that gives you the right to steal the identity of a dead people while simultaniously blame us for supposedly harassing her parents? sorry but thats a huge FAIL in the book of common sense.
They've only been doing it in response to you using socks as Captain adderall, angraygaypope, and other anons and mark bunker.
Again, you're no better then the people you claim are evil. I would support you too if you cleaned up your act, Tom.
"
They've only been doing it in response to you using socks as Captain adderall, angraygaypope, and other anons and mark bunker.
Again, you're no better then the people you claim are evil. I would support you too if you cleaned up your act, Tom."
Again, try addressing the content of the blogpost. You goons tend to ignore everything I write while jumping at my throat. Stop it. Read the post and then explain to me how "Anonymous" has nothing to do with ED again. I could use a laugh.
Tom
"Again, try addressing the content of the blogpost. You goons tend to ignore everything I write while jumping at my throat."
Isn't this exactly what you're doing to Anonymous? Attacking them, rather than what they have to say? The only difference I can see is that your allegations have little connection to reality.
tom cant spell but yet calls others illiterate ignoramus? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLOLOLOL
and MEGA lulz at the donate button
TL;DR version first:
Tom Newton's real name is Bruce N Burhans and if you whitepage/google his name on ZabaSearch/WhitePages or an Intelius BackGround check you'll dig up his address/phone number. None of which are here even though I doubt the mods would be upset by it :)
The question is quite rhetorical in nature these days, ultimately when asking the question "Who is Tom Newton" one uncovers a ridiculous web of fake user-names, multiple personalities and an identity and personality disorder that would scare Barbara Schwarz. However, since some of us have been posting to various linux user groups for many years, SOME of us who migrated from one thing to the next (ultimately ending up here) know who Tom Newton really is.
It kind of starts in 2000 or a little earlier on the Debian usenet. He posts as a user named "Bruce Burhans" but in his introductory posting states he is from Bellingham Washington State. Fast forward to 2005 and he is using the name Tom Newton. How did the Internet forget about this guy and how did we come to believe his name is REALLY Alan Connor? The fact is simple, when trolling users Bruce typically lets a piece of his real life go into his postings until he has obtained the coveted "NO U" answer to which he begins his trolling.
A briefing history of Tom which reveals his identity...
Bruce Burhans = Farley Benn?
Pay attention to what is being said in that discussion, notice the "Bruce from Bellingham" statement? That's kind of key. Now this post is important. This is his real first introductory attempt at trolling a usenet and he's left himself open. Unfortunately the concept of "doxing/trolling"a person online had not yet come of age. Therefore, the following snippet on a Washington State "Green Peace" clone website goes un-noticed.
"Bruce Burhans of Seattle writes about our recent program on losses of the ozone layer. "you have aired two excellent programs on the ozone problem, " Mr. Burhans writes, "but have not mentioned the semi-conductor PC chip industry." Their solvents, he says, are a growing source of ozone-destroying chemicals."
Sauce: Living on Earth: August 21 1992
Now go to this link: Intelius Search: Bruce Burhans
Notice something? Seattle? Bellingham?
I'd expand on this, but I find this information is PROBABLY sufficient to now troll/annoy Bruce with.
Also, think about this one
FCC Amateur Radio License:
Call Sign: KB7OCI, Licensee ID: L00200535
Grant Date: 09/03/1991, Expiration Date: 09/03/2001, Cancelation Date: 09/04/2003
Registrant: Bruce N Burhans,************, Seattle, WA 98122
Anonymous is offline Report Post Reply With Quote
Jesus Christ, Almighty. It's like arguing with a drunk.Well, it's preferable to arguing with a very noisy brick-wall. Plus, drunks tend to get tangential, compared to a certain broken-record with nothing even remotely interesting (or accurate) to say. At least they give you some variety in their unprompted rants.
Not all my readers are mindless drones and followers.Lol. Yeah, most of 'em. Too bad he can't tell which are which.
You seriously think you can point your 9000 fingers at ME, and label me the criminal when all I am doing is pointing out ANONYMOUS' criminal conduct.+
Again, try addressing the content of the blogpost. You goons tend to ignore everything I write while jumping at my throat.Waaaaaah...somebody cranky because the internet isn't responding the way they want it to? Tough-cookies! That's the way things work when you vomit up outrageous bullshit and throw it into the public arena. If after almost two years of blogging he (they?) haven't figured this out, then the only rational explanation is that they have some kind of cognitive deficit.
Oh, and persecution complex much?
You know she's pretty hot, I fapped to the before and after pics.
Tom Newton
TOM. You refuse to accept that there are NO rules in anonymous. Anonymous is just simply anonymous people. Notice that all anonymous don't agree on the same thing? If they did there would be A LOT more of them at scientology protests! But they are not there because they do not agree with the protest anon's because they are not into it. Like someone above said "none of the people who edited the car crash article did anything with scientology's pages." It's like saying "human kills another human! humans are evil!" but thats the thing. Humans are not evil some of them are. And lets not forget that YOU could go and do things in the name of anonymous. ANYONE CAN. There is no need for this petty crap. Talk about the anonymous involved with scientology or GTFO. And to the rest of the people here...please stop giving tom newton the attention you give him. You are the only people besides him who comment here and it gives him fuel to keep going. Tom is using a dead girl to help persuade people to not listen to us for the good of scientology. how fucked up is that. Tom likes to read entire posts and pick out the things he can argue about and just respond to that. Ignoring the rest of the post. This is a perfect example of tom's mind at work. Ignoring the bigger picture.
Post a Comment
ALL DEATH THREATS WILL BE REPORTED TO GOOGLE.COM, THE FBI, AND YOUR LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.