Disturbing Religious Worship:
302. (a) Every person who intentionally disturbs or disquiets any
assemblage of people met for religious worship at a tax-exempt place of worship, by profane discourse, rude or indecent behavior, or by any unnecessary noise, either within the place where the meeting is held, or so near it as to disturb the order and solemnity of the meeting, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for a period not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.
---SOURCE
Once again, the cyber-bully network known as "Anonymous" has garnered negative attention from law enforcement with their Anti-Religion hate demonstrations. This time, it was the signs encouraging drivers to honk their horns that was the problem.
Picket signs such as "HONK IF YOU HATE SCIENTOLOGISTS" are used interrupt religious services, and communicate to Scientology parishioners that they are hated:
One Anonymous member known as "Zulas" or "HyperAnon" expressed concern about her loss of anonymity:
"Originally Posted by Zulas 
Ok, sorry guys I was gone for a minute. I saw the cars pull up everywhere and they said that we were doing something wrong and the scilons had three videos to prove it(probably Allender's) and took out me, Pacman, and OG away from the group and told us we were "disturbing church services" by "encouraging people to honk their horns" because we had "Honk if ''something something" Scientology" signs. So we gave them our information, the scilons now know our faces, and will soon be able to access the info we gave the police. Pretty much sucks :\" -- Source : http://forums.whyweprotest.net/284-usa-west-coast/san-jose-raid-gets-raided-pd-45281/2/
("Zulas" or "HyperAnon": Anti-Scientology Activist/ Cyber-Bully)
I don't understand what the big deal is. "Fair Game" has already been debunked as a lie which Anti-Scientologists use to demonize "Scilons" (Scientologists). Their paranoia is simply not justified:
Another thing which I find disturbing: despite Anonymous' endorsement of Pedo-Cultural Icon "Pedo-Bear," Anonymous members still see nothing wrong with bringing their children to the protests:
According to their own paranoid beliefs, Anonymous members must remain masked to protect themselves against harassment. Does this mean that these "parents" are willingly placing their children in what they truly believe is a dangerous situation?
Yes, it does. And for some reason, I don't find this one bit surprising...
Tom Newton
31 comments:
this whole site is a fair game op!
Oh really?
Don't you mean "Black PR"?
The only thing wearing those masks does is makes you paranoid.
Tom Newton
you are aware that the man in that video isn't wearing a mask either, right?
I like how your version of the YouTube video screenshot takes out the "(kinda)" text at the end of the title.
Stay classy Tom.
anonymous is not a hate group for two reasons:
one, it's not a group. it's what comes up when you don't give your name.
two, critics do not target a protected class, but an organization that fraudulently poses as a non-profit religious institution, ripping off not only their poor members, but the US taxpayers as well. they broke into the IRS, for crying out loud!
whatever religious aspects there are to scientology can be found (from what i understand) outside the org, with "freezoners". i have never seen a serious critic of scientology hold anything against the freezoners, everyone is entitled to their beliefs in America.
NO ONE is entitled to fraud and tax-evasion.
if scientology were to be re-classified as a FOR-PROFIT institution as it in fact is, i have no doubt that most (possibly nearly all!) protests would cease.
sure, the beliefs are silly. lots of people believe silly things and nobody cares. believe whatever you want, just shut down the CRIMINAL CULT SCIENTOLOGY, which has been engaged in criminal activities since the day it was founded.
pay your taxes like the rest of us, don't take people away from their families.
it would be so easy for the scientologists to stop all this, but their leadership is apparently insane.
it costs $250,000 to complete scientology lessons and "cross the bridge".
median per capita income in the US is $24,000. people are losing their life savings and their families to this scam.
the only reason to charge people for spiritual instruction is to rip them off. real churches don't have dues and fees and mandatory expensive classes, they get DONATIONS and do just fine.
"
one, it's not a group. it's what comes up when you don't give your name."
It's not a group? Lol.
Then what is it? A "collective"? An insurrection? A random uprising of concerned citizens?
You hate-mongers really have a way with words...
Tom
trolling "tom osa newton" allways is lulz
Didn't we already prove this guy was OSA a few weeks back? With that whole "scientology security services" phoning up when someone asked for Tom to ring him?
"You hate-mongers really have a way with words"
You're the one who said someone had a banner saying "HONK IF YOU HATE SCIENTOLOGISTS". As in, trying to make it look as if the protesters were against the people brainwashed by scientology rather than the criminal organisation itself.
"
You're the one who said someone had a banner saying "HONK IF YOU HATE SCIENTOLOGISTS". As in, trying to make it look as if the protesters were against the people brainwashed by scientology rather than the criminal organisation itself."
Distortion. Stop lying. You are not "only against the organization" and you know it. I have hundreds of comments, pictures, and videos to prove otherwise.
I'm going to tear your whole charade to shreds. Your movement will be buried in it's own ****.
Tom Newton
nice try tom, you can't stop us though.
I really hate to break it to you Tom, but we really do just hate the organization. And if the organization changed, you know Anonymous would "go away." It is staggeringly simple and has nothing to do with your individual members.
In regard to your "fair game doesn't exist" statement, I applaud you for not propagating a dangerous and hateful action, but take down the face photos of our members anyway. You might not believe it, but like any group, I'm sure Scientology has extreme outliers that would try to fair game that Anon. Since you're not like that, I know you won't leave that picture up for that girl to become a target like she fears.
"Distortion. Stop lying. You are not "only against the organization" and you know it."
You're distorting what people write and say, no matter how much you believe your distortion to be true it's still distortion.
The sign in the image above is not from our local protest. no one had the word hate written on any of the signs. bending the truth is what you do Tom - Good job.
Well Tom has taken pictures from an Anti-Semitic protest in the middle east and calmed it as Anonymous.
Source:
http://anonymous-is-a-hategroup.blogspot.com/2008/11/anonymous-anti-religion-extremists.html
It's not a group? Lol.
Then what is it? A "collective"? An insurrection? A random uprising of concerned citizens?you've been told what it is, it's what message boards put if you don't want to give a name. like on this very site. and the reason critics of the criminal scientology org don't want to give their names is because of fair-gaming shit like this site.
You are not "only against the organization" and you know it. I have hundreds of comments, pictures, and videos to prove otherwise.no you don't. you only have made-up garbage that pretends anonymous is some organized entity like scientology. it never was and never will be. it's just people who read all the shit scientology did on the internet and decided they didn't want to see more people ripped off and in debt to this criminal organization.
you yourself are anonymous, using a fake handle online. you are too chicken to practice what you preach.
I'm going to tear your whole charade to shreds. Your movement will be buried in it's own ****.fine, no one cares if 'anonymous' is a movement or not. that's the whole point. there's nothing to attack. it's like saying you're going to shut down 'nobody'. (oh, this is the internet buddy, you can say 'shit' here.)
tom, tell your scientology bosses to release all techs to the public for FREE (like all non-cult religions do, nobody's hiding secret parts of the bible or koran are they?), and get re-classified as a FOR-PROFIT organization or stop charging people $250,000 for the tech and operate only on donations like all non-cult religions do. nobody will pay any more attention to your dumbass science-fiction religion. south park won't make fun of you anymore. protests will dwindle to nothing. wouldn't that be nice.
fuck the org, give the tech away for free instead of dangling it in front of people like a carrot so you can leech every last penny from their pockets. don't the wogs deserve a chance to get their thetans out? i thought you people were gonna clear the world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology)
Gee Tom 15 months of anon protests.... I'd say you are doing a great job shredding us. Let's say another 15 months and we'll check back to see how your doing.
Its just like that spokeswomen in feb 08 who said "scientology is handling anonymous and its only a matter of time and this will all be over" that worked well huh scifags. Really great job.
Cancellation of Fair Game
In July 1968, Hubbard canceled HCOPL 18 Oct 67 Issue IV, Penalties for Lower Conditions, replacing it with HCOPL 21 July 68, Penalties for Lower Conditions.[11] This redefined the condition of Enemy as follows:
"Suppressive Person order. May not be communicated with by anyone except an Ethics Officer, Master at Arms, a Hearing Officer or a Board or Committee. May be restrained or imprisoned. May not be protected by any rules or laws of the group he sought to injure as he sought to destroy or bar fair practices for others. May not be trained or processed or admitted to any org." [12]
In addition, in October that year, Hubbard issued HCOPL 21 Oct 68 Cancellation of Fair Game, which said:
"The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations. This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatment or handling of an SP."
This letter states that it cancels only the use of the term "fair game" for its "bad PR" effect, and not the policy on the treatment of "suppressive persons" in question. Critical authors such as Jon Atack and websites such as Operation Clambake read the wording of HCOPL 21 Oct 68 to assert that the penalties outlined in HCOPL 18 Oct 67 Issue IV, which were canceled and replaced by those in HCOPL 21 July 68, have been canceled in name only.
tell your masters to give out the tech for free tom, you silly niggerfaggot.
"Anonymous said...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology)
May 10, 2009 12:53 PM "
Is Wikipedia a reliable source or not? Make up your mind.
Tom
^Sorry Tom. Not every person that posts Anonymously thinks exactly the same thing. Just because that's the case in your cult it doesn't mean it's the case for the people that protests against its criminal activities.
Oh really? So how do you know who is right? How can any one of you presume to agree with any of the others?
Go ahead. Keep on pretending like you aren't a hate based bandwagon. You aren't fooling anyone.
Anon-Orange was laughed at by judges when he tried to claim that Anonymous is "not an organization." What a crock.
Stop watching those action hero movies and research just what it is that you are a part of. Or, if you happen to think that Wikipedia is a valid source of information, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaderless_resistanceTom Newton
"Oh really? So how do you know who is right? How can any one of you presume to agree with any of the others?
Go ahead. Keep on pretending like you aren't a hate based bandwagon. You aren't fooling anyone."
We don't care who is right because there is nothing official about our collective. It's just like any political movement. In any political party or union there are people who disagree with each other. Every person acts on her own behalf. I, for one, hate (yes, hate) what some Anonymous members do at raids but the only thing I can do about it is speak out against it and convince other people to do the same.
Tom, you're just a caricature of a religionist who has the same persecuted victim mentality that fuels the malevolence in Gaza. You feel victimized and therefore anything goes. The problem is you obviously don't know our side and fundamentally don't understand what Anonymous (or even the Internet it seems) is. Scientology seems to speak out so much against ignorance in society but aren't you being ignorant of our side of the story?
Wikipedia
has less factual errors than
the Britannica
"El Diablo said...
Wikipedia
has less factual errors than
the Britannica"
I know it has FEWER factual errors than the Britannica.
However, when I reference Wikipedia, Anonymous members tell me how it's not reliable.
Then, when I call them on their inconsistencies, I am told that "Anonymous is not an organization" and therefore, has no consensus of opinion. Just how this makes sense to a hoard of followers wearing identical masks escapes me but that's another topic.
Tom
Choose "fewer" or "less"?
When syllables rule the form
Either is quite apt!
tom you idiot almost no anonymous even know each other. how come the masks are the same, it's called a fad stupid, like when all kids get yo-yos at the same time in grade shcool. there is no organization, jsut message boards exactly like this. no reason anonymous couldn't use this comment space to coordinate protests, all that's needed is place and time.
not that hard to figure out, but you want to talk about anything except how scientology makes massive profits while avoiding decades of taxes owed to the u.s. taxpayers.
real religions rely on donations, scientology is defrauding their members and the united states/
free the tech, you rip-off artists. quit stealing people's money. it costs less to get a master's degree than to complete scientology.
The thing that bothers me the most about what Tom does on the internet for $cientology is that he thinks that its working and that it helps scilons and hurts anon. Its one thing for us to have an honest open debate in the comments section of blogs where we point out each others argument back and forth trying to convince the other that we are right and the other is wrong. But what Tom does is truly pointless and actually counter productive to the aims of $cientology. He hurts their already damaged image by constantly failing to win the argument in front of potential scilons or anons or regular public who might be on the fence. When he is proven wrong by anonymous members time and again his response is in effect “I’m wrong and I have no proof to counter their argument. What can I do when they have clear and obvious dox and I don’t have any dox or proof to counter with.” So what does he do? He ignores the obvious correct statements or videos and dissects something from the video or article and twist and manipulate it and change the story to fit his argument. Maybe he throws something in from another page maybe ED or maybe he takes something old and repackages it differently and says its new. The same old allegations are falling on deaf ears since he can’t prove what he’s saying as fact and everyone eventually figures out its just his opinion and anything he says should be disregarded. His response to this will probably be the same waste of time he’s been participating in for the last year but I say hey let him help us by making all scilons look crazy and racist and not able to think clearly and for themselves and has to do what ever his silicon handles say. Tom will try to link everyone and everything into a simple package like anon are pedo’s by taking some dumb twisted comment from ED and say all anonymous is just ED and everything is linked because some anions go to that site. How stupid. Everyone can see through this. Everyone can see Tom for what he is and what he does. How pathetic that Tom’s “religion” has him serving them by doing this stupid shit on the internet and always loosing the battle between fact and opinion. Is this what $cientology is all about? Tom what are you doing this for? Why look stupid and waste your time. Your only one man, anon is an army. How can you thin you could ever even try to keep up. Like if I offered the fair game argument and said that I can physically hand you court papers from several old scilon cases proving fair game exists and you will still say that it does not exist and those papers with a government seal are fake and part of the extremely lucrative “anti-$cientology racket”. TOM’S REAL NAME IS……. THOMAS “FAIR” GAME the III. I got more to say but its pissing me off how much time I’m wasting on this turd so I’m gonna stop proving how pointless Tom’s comments really are and how ineffective a strategy like the one he is using since he’s so outnumbered and has nothing but opinion and when someone who is not anon asks for real proof of wrongdoing they never get any and right their his total ineptitude lost another one to our side.
Why hasn’t Tom Newton finished “shredding anonymous” and brought about our destruction….? Oh wait that’s right Tom just needs to quote ED a little more and then everyone will believe him. Well before Tom starts lurking let me ask a rhetorical question to him: can he provide “evidence” about any so called crime committed by anonymous if he cant use ED as a source. Can he quote any “proof” without having to twist the story and add in a URL for some ED page that has nothing to do with peaceful protesting of the cult of $cientology. Oh who am I kidding TomBot won’t die unless ED goes offline and Toms infinite source of everything anonymous goes away and he can’t provide “absolute hard evidence” any more (hahahah evidence, lol) Like how every member of anonymous and you too Tom for going their yourself to jack off to pink bears and those others who only visit ED and all of which are obvious pedophiles right. Blah blah blah I can’t believe he thinks he can win against a whole army of people who all universally don’t know or even care about each other but who all share a common bond….. they have had very negative experiences with the cult of $cientology. And the best thing is the blown members bring new information with them everytime they leave the cult and we use that to wage our war which is practically at its middle. I know anonymous has YEARS of fighting still to do but let me ask you this… the cult or anonymous? Who can outlast who? We need very little money and resources to practically shut down the church and restrict any new members and hurt its public image all with almost no money or resources and very little supplies and yet on the other hand they spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year on all sorts of fail shit and its gets them nothing but big fancy empty building and when they harass newcomers those being harassed get embolden and they now feel like it is personal and they feel the fight against the cult is a just fight and deserves ALOT of the individuals time and money and effort. The cult is after all the cults worst enemy. By attacking everyone they create new anti-$cientology supporters everyday, not just anonymous but everyday normal people who got mixed up in fair game by asking a simple question to a scilon like “What is your religion about? Is it really about aliens and lots of forced donations?” and then boom they are followed and harassed and fair gamed and then right their $cientology has a new life long enemy who would have probably forgot it if the cult didn’t push the person into taking a real stance against them. And new ideal orgs filled with nothing but empty air is not gonna go well when you got bills and lawyer fees and court cost and PR boners left and right cuz I for one will never give up. I know the hard core anons who will never and I mean never stop fighting the cult. And now we can do more with less. I mean after all in the beginning with almost 12 thousand members shit wasn’t popping in the news all that much but now as were down to a few thousand world wide the TV and Internet are alive with anti-$cientology stories. We may not be able to make your current brainwashed members quit but I can say with absolute assurance that you will not be getting any new members and eventually you will bleed them dry and they will physically have no more money and you will be forced to sell scilon properties and maybe even the rights to some LRH copyrights. Oh fuck it I’m tired of telling the world were winning and $cientology has been losing for at least the early 90’s when stat drops were at their worst then a slight rebound in the early 2000’s with the help of celebs but even now ask yourself this: When was the last time a real, for real type, celeb publicly praise scilon and said they support it as a whole other than Will Smith or other cultist that been indoctrinated. When did you see Juliet Lewis or fat ass Kirstie or Giovanni Ribisi or that blond dyke at a CCHR function. FUCK YOU $CAMOLOGY. anonymous legally can’t fail.
Tom what are you gonna do now? At this rate the cult will be bankrupt within a matter of a decade. Yes a decade I said. But constant pressure and more young people raised on the Internet and who have free access to all this hard data will learn what is cult and what is not cult. Plus the bad economy for the next few years plus all the international court and other probs you been having. I think its almost over. Just stay applying the pressure and maybe the cult will crack within ten years? Time will move before you know it will be 2017 and the newly formed FBI cult watch group will raid RTC and arrest the new leader as DM will die from being a asthmatic dwarf douche who is a pussy and punches staff bigger then him only when he has 11 Sea Org bodyguards behind him to stand on their shoulders. David Miscarage of justice is only 5'3 in real life. I saw him at an event in 99 when my family was still kind of active. They use to throw out all the papers and private and sensitive material in locally placed garbage cans around the building and I stared stealing and leaking documents that a year later they instituted a new policy about having those mini shredders attached to the top of these grey garbage cans and anything important or sensitive would be destroyed before it go to the "big outside garbage pile" from which I and my sister stole literally hundreds of documents. Most were stupid nothing of interest papers but one out of every 50 pages of useless junk was one paper with lots of damaging info and I would re-release them to the Internet but its got so much legal and copyright probs I would be found out as my family is on the PTS list of semi active members who attend big events but not regularly participate yet the cult still considers full active members and if I leaked them I might get a Gerry Armstrong type of wake up in the near future cuz some of these have never been released by the gov.... even 7 IRS related papers that the FOIA request denied me. (they don't have much other than list of lawsuits and the money and lawyers they were paying and how much it was costing each year to fund these suits versus the total possible profit if they could achieve tax status
Post a Comment
ALL DEATH THREATS WILL BE REPORTED TO GOOGLE.COM, THE FBI, AND YOUR LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.